Analysing the Group Work Process-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write a reflection report discussing and analysing the group work process undertaken during the group case study assessment. Students should refer to team work theory, and explain how well or poorly it operated in their group, and in their own specific performance. Answer: The reflection is a significant exercise in the learning and development as it increases the mental ability to learn and apply the knowledge in the practical situations. In the reflection, a person analyses the past experiences and situations and derives meaningful conclusions. It is important to identify different aspects and use them in the personal growth. In the present, a reflection is taken for the case group study assignment. We were a group of five people and the assignment was to analyse a case study, given by the tutor. Working in a group can be challenging, as there can be conflicts at different instances regarding the direction of the case, personal responsibilities and the individual contribution. In the present reflection, the team work in the case study assignment will be analysed with the help of Belbins team role model. Conclusively, an action plan so that the weaknesses identified can be addressed. The Belbins team model states that when a team is performing as per the expectations or best, the team work as an alliance. In this alliance, each group member has a certain or specific duty. Also, this group member is dedicated towards his responsibility or role towards the task. These responsibilities are clear, and every role required for the proper fulfilment of the teams role is performed in a complete manner. It can be reflected from the past experience, that when a team work together, there are no individual strengths and weaknesses, but the weakness persists at the team level. It means that the individual weakness can affect the team significantly. Therefore, a person can support the team, by understanding his involvement with the team in a better manner and manage the weaknesses and the strength at the team level. The Belbins model is focussed at developing more balanced teams. The balanced teams refer to the types of teams, in which each member has a different contribution. However, if more than a single person is demonstrating a similar behaviour, it can affect the team in a negative manner. If the team members have the similar king of weakness, then that weakness will emerge. Therefore, it is important that different team members have different contributing role in the team. Moreover, if the team members have similar strength, they will compete with each other rather than complementing one another and contributing for the common goals. It is important for the team leader to assure that the team members have different roles and responsibilities, which best suits their styles (Mathieu, Tannenbaum, Kukenberger, Donsbach, and Alliger, 2015). The team roles defined in the Belbins model are based on the personal observation and the individual communication style of individual participant of the teams. In most of the teams, an individual tends to attend a particular team role, which is dependent upon the behaviour and the personal style of that individual. There are also certain other factors, such as the natural working style of the individual, interrelationships with other working people and the task in hand. According to this model, the members of the team also affect the behaviour of the team participants. According to this model, there are none team roles, which can be differentiated into action oriented, people oriented and thought oriented groups. Each group role is characterized by different behaviour and personal strength of the team member. According to this model, each role also has some associated weakness with the team roles. The action oriented roles are, shaper, implementer and completer-finisher. The people oriented roles are coordinator, team work, and resource investigator. The thought oriented roles refers to the plant, monitor-evaluate and specialist. In the action-oriented roles, the shaper challenges the performance of the team, and motivates it to innovate. The implementer strategizes so that the ideas can be put into action, and the finisher ensures that the tasks are completed on time (Eubanks, Palanski, Olabisi, Joinson, and Dove, 2016). The coordinator acts as the chairperson of the team and the tram workers promotes the cooperation between the team members. The resource investigator manages and finds all the opportunities within the team. In the thought oriented roles, the plant is the designated person, who presents new ideas and approaches within the team members, the evaluator analysed different roles and the specialists provides special or technical skills for the assigned task (Ruch, Gander, Platt, and Hofmann, 2018). In the present task of case study analysis, I worked as a coordinator. I perceived that there are several challenges, when different people come across to work together. There were several issues, in which there were conflicts in the team members. A few participants were always quarrelling as their approach to the case study was quite different. It was really challenging to keep both the parties happy in the problem solving process. I realized that pointing out the mistakes of other is never a good idea. Moreover, it is important to understand the problem from every one perspective and hear every person out (Platt, Ruch, Gander, and Hofmann, 2017). The solution proposed must be positive for each team member. There was one instance, in which two team members fought during the solution of the case study. It was because both of the people were interpreting the case study in a different manner. They were not backing and started calling each other names. In this situation, it was importan t to intervene, so that the matter does not heat up more. I listened to both the people and conducted a poll for the support of their view. It was a just action in the present case. Being the coordinator of the team, I took on the traditional role of the team leader or the chairperson of the team. The task assigned to the tem was to solve a particular management case study within a specific time frame. As a coordinator, I guided the team regarding their specific objectives. I also defined the roles and the task for each individual team member. I realized that to be an effective coordinator, or the team leader, I need to have excellent listening skills. I also need to realize the specific value that each team member is bringing to the team. It is important to be calm and good natured irrespective of the situation in front of the team members (Meslec and Cur?eu, 2015). The delegation of the task is also an important role of the coordinator. I realized that it is important to delegate task according to the personal strength and interest of each team member. It is necessary so that each task can be competed with efficiency and highest productivity. People tend to be more dedicated towards the task which appeals their interest. It can be reflected that good communication skills are essential in being the team leader. The team leader must be able to explore different options, develop contacts and negotiate on behalf of the whole team. They must be able to work with the external stakeholders to accomplish the objectives of the team. Therefore, it is important to be able to communicate the ideas to different people in a strong manner and to be receptive of others innovative and beneficial ideas. The team coordinator should also possess the skill of motivating others. In the team work, there are several instances, in which the team members are not able to work as per rtheir expectations. It reduces their confidence and weakens their motivation. Lack of motivation is harmful as it affects the overall productivity of the team. It can be concluded that there are several roles in team and each role should be fulfilled in a proper manner, so that the objectives of the team are fulfilled. I worked as the coordinator in the team and fulfilled various responsibilities as the decision-maker, negotiator, representative and the motivator. I realized that in order to become an effective communicator, a person requires good communication skills and extroversion ability. They are also helpful in making contacts. I perceive that I lack these qualities and need to work on them. I will attend communication classes for achieving the targets. Other than that, I will also take part in debates and extempore. I will read self-help books and watch videos, which can help in developing my communication skills. In this action plan, I have created a timeline of two months, and I will monitor my performance constantly for performance. References Eubanks, D. L., Palanski, M., Olabisi, J., Joinson, A., and Dove, J., 2016. Team dynamics in virtual, partially distributed teams: Optimal role fulfillment.Computers in human behavior,61, 556-568. Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kukenberger, M. R., Donsbach, J. S., and Alliger, G. M., 2015. Team role experience and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity.Group Organization Management,40(1), 6-34. Meslec, N. and Cur?eu, P. L., 2015. Are balanced groups better? Belbin roles in collaborative learning groups.Learning and Individual Differences,39, 81-88. Platt, T., Ruch, W., Gander, F. and Hofmann, J., 2017. Team Roles: Their Relationships to Character Strengths and Job Satisfaction.Journal of Positive Psychology. Ruch, W., Gander, F., Platt, T. and Hofmann, J., 2018. Team roles: Their relationships to character strengths and job satisfaction.The Journal of Positive Psychology,13(2), 190-199.